"I do think that this started as an accident," Sir Richard Dearlove told he Telegraph, citing a peer-reviewed paper by Professor Angus Dalgleish of St George's Hospital at the University of London, and the Norwegian virologist Birger Sorensen.
The authors said the virus had been doctored to bind to humans: "We are aware that these findings could have political significance and raise troubling questions."
Dearlove added: "[A]s this debate about the virus develops, I think all this material is going to be in print and is going to embarrass a number of people, I think. Let's suggest that the Chinese maybe have too much say in their journals, in what appears and what doesn't."
He added: "Look, the Chinese understand us extremely well. They have made a study of us over the last decade or longer, particularly through attending our universities. We understand the Chinese very poorly. It's an imbalanced relationship in that respect." TO READ ENTIRE ARTICLE CLICK HERE
Is this British source reliable or is this just an opinion because the individual does not trust China? For instance, I could say that not only did the Chinese engineer this virus but they released it on the world intentionally hoping to destroy economies believing that they were in a better position to come out on top in the end than the US...
Of course, my thoughts and beliefs are not valid but I am no one of importance... but, what if I had been stationed in China for the CIA for 20 years as an American teacher...
Would my credentials and beliefs be considered more substantial?
No comments:
Post a Comment